In order to understand which of these two softwares are more suitable for your thesis research, let us simplify the work and features of the two.
01
HFSS is developed on the Finite Element Method (FEM) making it more accurate for antenna development; whereas, CST is based on the Finite Integration in Technique (FIT) making it popular because of the ease in stimulation while antenna designing.
02
When it comes to handling the broadband problems, HFSS has turned out to be slower than the CST TD solver. However, when it comes to the narrowband issues, HFSS and CST FD solver are the preferable choices over the CST TD solver.
03
HFSS is a better option while handling the frequency domain based simulations; whereas, when it comes to the time domain based simulations, CST solves the issues more accurately and faster.
04
Both the software provides accuracy according to their specializations. Where HFSS is considered to be the better software when it comes to antenna design, the structure, which includes electron beam in the designing process, needs CST software as it provides various ways to modulate the same.
As much as these softwares make the thesis look better and help in preparing an exceptional research work, these are not easy to understand. When it comes to the implementation only the experts who have years of experience can proficiently work on them.
360Dissertations puts quality as one of the top priority, which is why we make sure our experts are well acquainted with the software’s in and out. Our software engineers make sure that CST or HFSS implementation does not become a barrier in completing your thesis research work.
The waiting time is over. If you have stuck during your engineering thesis development because of the complexity of the software, let us help you out.
2021. 360 Dissertation. All Rights Reserved by